more on Real Sex
I read this critical review of Real Sex today. The writer takes issue with Winner's blanket statements about extramarital sex as always distorted, bad or hurtful. She says the tradition " lies every time it denies that sex outside of marriage can be very beautiful and “real,” and, by the same token, that sex inside marriage can be very abusive and distorted."
I think the author had some interesting ideas about questioning the church's traditional distinctions about sex. It still seems that no one is addressing the things we had really hoped to find in Lauren Winner's book: how does one affirm embodied personhood and sexuality when you do not have a relationship to express it in? It seems the monastic tradition might have some answers for us, as we discussed at thorubos. Maybe it's the book we can write.
I think the author had some interesting ideas about questioning the church's traditional distinctions about sex. It still seems that no one is addressing the things we had really hoped to find in Lauren Winner's book: how does one affirm embodied personhood and sexuality when you do not have a relationship to express it in? It seems the monastic tradition might have some answers for us, as we discussed at thorubos. Maybe it's the book we can write.